CALL US AT 855.292.6556 Contact CONTACT US
 
 
image link is broken
Defective Title of Foreclosed Properties October 18, 2011
By Angi Comas
 

The title problems resulting from the mass volume of foreclosure lawsuits in the courts is becoming a major problem in this country with a direct effect on the housing market now and for many years to come.  Imagine the following scenario:

Foreclosure Notice

The bank filed a foreclosure suit, won, took title, and sold the property to an independent third party. Now imagine that you are the third party purchaser – you bought a home from a bank that obtained title via foreclosure. You move into and live in the house you purchased from the bank at a foreclosure auction.  Then suddenly, the original homeowner, who owned the property before the bank foreclosed, has convinced a court that she still owns the property.  Incredibly, in light of the bank’s failure to correctly prosecute the foreclosure lawsuit, the homeowner is right –  she still owns the house.

The problem is created through a break in the chain of mortgage ownership. Until the 1980’s, most mortgages were loans between the homeowner and a bank, who lent the money directly.  More recently, the mortgage financing system transformed into an international system of securitization, with mortgage lenders packaging their loans into securities, bought and sold by investors like stocks. These transactions even split individual mortgages into sections, where each loan could have parts owned by different investment banks.

The transfer of ownership in these mortgage backed securities (MBS) was done with contracts on the balance sheets of Wall Street investment banks, such as Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs. The company who originally appeared to make the loan was normally a retail lending company such as Countrywide or Lending Tree, who typically acted as a sales company, and sometimes remained contracted to service the loan.

In the event that the loan goes into foreclosure at a later date, the then-current owner of the loan files the foreclosure and sells the property to a new owner, often at auction. The land records would show a deed of transfer from the investment bank to the new owner. This creates a break in the chain of ownership of the mortgage rights. In many cases, the transfer of ownership of the mortgage loan has gone from the original lender, through several owners, and then to the foreclosing bank, none of which is recorded on the property title history. Technically, the foreclosing bank has no recorded title rights to foreclose in the first place.

MERS announced it changed its procedures to require that an assignment of mortgage be filed prior to the start of any foreclosure suit. Typically, a mortgage is recorded in the public records with MERS as nominee for ABC Corporation. Invariably, when the foreclosure lawsuit is filed, it is not filed in the name of ABC Corporation it is filed in the name of Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase or some securitized trust – an entity with no relationship to ABC Corporation.

In most foreclosure cases, banks’ lawyers argue the plaintiff has standing if it is the “holder” of the Note (i.e. if it possesses the original note with a special endorsement in blank.) Many judges accept this position, no questions asked and thus, an assignment of mortgage is often viewed as irrelevant and superfluous.

Even if Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase, or the securitized trust has standing without an Assignment of Mortgage in the public record, ABC Corporation is still the mortgage holder of record. This means that even if Bank of America, JP Morgan, or whoever prevails in the foreclosure is the high bidder at the auction, acquires title, and sells the property to a third party, ABC Corporation is still the mortgage holder of record. What does that mean? Essentially, the entire foreclosure case was like a wild deed – it took place, but ABC Corporation can still institute a foreclosure lawsuit in its own name, as it would have priority over the bona fide purchaser who acquired title from the bank.

If ABC Corporation is the mortgage holder of record, and it is not named as a party in the mortgage foreclosure suit, and there is no Assignment of Mortgage, then the mortgage in favor of ABC Corporation still exists, even after the foreclosure, even after the auction, and even after the sale to the third party. The foreclosure happened, but as far as ABC Corporation is concerned, the foreclosure is irrelevant – it still has the mortgage.

To sum it all up, when purchasing your next Tampa home, especially in the case of foreclosure, it is very important to seek the advice of a real estate attorney and if possible, purchase title insurance when you purchase a property.

 
 
 
image link is broken
Mortgage rates at 5-week low November 13, 2009
By David B Moyer
 

Long-term mortgages rates moved lower again this week, hitting the lowest level in five weeks.

Freddie Mac‘s weekly report says the average 30-year fixed-rate mortgage was 4.91 percent in the week ending Nov. 12, down from 4.98 percent last week. Rates on 30-year mortgages have been below 5 percent for five of the last seven weeks.

A year ago, 30-year mortgages were averaging 6.14 percent.

A 15-year fixed-rate mortgage averaged 4.36 percent this week, remaining below one-year adjustable rate mortgages, which now average 4.46 percent.

“Mortgage rates eased further over the week, helping to promote an affordable home-purchase market and stimulate refinance,” said Freddie Mac (NYSE: FRE) chief economist Frank Nothaft. “This comes at a time when house price declines are moderating and consumer demand for prime mortgages at commercial banks has picked up.”

The National Association of Realtors this week said third quarter housing prices were down an average of 11.2 percent from a year ago, but 20 percent of the top metropolitan ares saw positive annual growth.

Sales continue to rise, with third quarter existing home sales up 11 percent from a year ago.

Tampa Bay Business Journal – by Jeff Clabaugh Washington Business Journal

 
 
 
image link is broken
Third Quarter Existing Home Sales Increase November 11, 2009
By David B Moyer
 

With stimulus provided by the new homeowners tax credit, we saw an increase in home sales in the 3rd Quarter of 2009. That is the good news. The bad news, prices dropped 11.2 percent from 2008 levels, ones anyone who watches real estate know were anemic.

Prices did rise in 30 of the 153 metro areas so that is a glimmer of hope, but the overall sales were on the lower end of the marketplace and directly related to the stimulus.

via NAR & therealestatebloggers.com

 
 
 
image link is broken
UPDATE: 2009 FIRST TIME HOME BUYER TAX CREDIT EXTENDED November 5, 2009
By David B Moyer
 
Tax break for buying a home

The legislation also would extend the $8,000 homebuyer tax credit to contracts signed by April 30 and closed by June 30. The controversial credit, which many say has boosted home sales in recent months, was set to expire after Nov. 30.

The bill also creates a $6,500 credit for those who buy a home after living in their current house at least five years. That measure would apply to contracts signed by April 30 and closed by June 30. The current credit defines a first-time homebuyer as someone who has not owned a residence within the past three years.

The credit would be available only for the purchase of principal residences priced at $800,000 or less.

The bill would raise the adjusted gross income cap to $125,000 for single filers and $225,000 for joint filers. The amount of the credit currently begins to phase out for taxpayers whose adjusted gross income is more than $75,000, or $150,000 for joint filers.

“It’s gonna put people back to work, the home builders, put people in the real estate business,” said Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn. “The kind of jobs that can make a difference.”

The extension will cost $10.8 billion over 10 years, according to the Joint Committee on Taxation.

Through mid-September, 1.4 million tax returns had qualified for the credit, according to the IRS. Some portion of those returns, which the IRS couldn’t specify, represents buyers who took advantage of an earlier version of the tax credit, which was only worth $7,500 and has to be repaid over time.

By the end of November, the credit will have been used by 1.8 million homebuyers, at least 355,000 of whom would not have bought a house without the tax break, according to estimates by the National Association of Realtors.

“The data on the present home buyer tax credit show that the credit has had its intended impact — sales have jumped in recent months to a projected 5.1 million for the year and housing inventory has been trimmed, thus stabilizing home prices noticeably,” said Ron Phipps, the association’s first vice president, in Senate testimony last month.

The credit, however, has also posed many problems. Critics say it’s a waste of money because most of those claiming the credit would have bought homes anyway.

It’s also been the target of fraud. Some 74,000 people claimed more than $500 million in credits even though they may not be first-time homeowners, according to Treasury officials. And more than 580 children, including some as young as 4-years-old, have claimed the credit.

“Some key controls were missing to prevent an individual from erroneously or fraudulently claiming the credit and receiving an erroneous refund of up to $8,000,” said J. Russell George, Treasury inspector general for tax administration, before a House subcommittee last month

By Tami Luhby, CNNMoney.com senior writer
Last Updated: November 5, 2009: 3:06 PM ET